<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Topic: Why the comparison?</title>
	<link>http://www.coasterdom.com/2008/02/20/weekly-topic-why-the-comparison/</link>
	<description>The latest news from the amusement industry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.coasterdom.com/2008/02/20/weekly-topic-why-the-comparison/#comment-59830</link>
		<author>Kevin</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.coasterdom.com/2008/02/20/weekly-topic-why-the-comparison/#comment-59830</guid>
		<description>I think most are comparing the wrong two rides.  Of course they are similar, but Maverick has a truly unique layout.  People should and will compare the roller coaster a few hundred feet away ... in the same park!

I don’t know what they were thinking with this one.  Having multiple wood coasters is a smart move (i.e. Holiday World, Hershey of course).  Having extremely similar steel coasters with all the variety of steel coaster styles available … guests aren’t that ignorant to “similar” look &#38; feel.

The two in-park coasters basically do the exact same thing:

- initial up &#38; down at similar angles
- inversions that twist upside down and dive to the ground or climb and twist out ... it's all similar
- Storm Runners inline roll-dive is half-like the pretzel loop
- they both meander around after the inversions
- the new one really doesn't have a unique layout ... except for the pretzel, we've seen it all before

People will love it, of course, but for the long term?  I believe a better more popular decision could've been made.  A hyper coaster has a much broader appeal, and there popularity survives much longer.  Look at all the new mini-hypers the same company has built?  I don't see why this new one isn't a hyper!

Why didn’t they just put in an Invertigo to go with Boomerang?  It would’ve cost less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most are comparing the wrong two rides.  Of course they are similar, but Maverick has a truly unique layout.  People should and will compare the roller coaster a few hundred feet away &#8230; in the same park!</p>
<p>I don’t know what they were thinking with this one.  Having multiple wood coasters is a smart move (i.e. Holiday World, Hershey of course).  Having extremely similar steel coasters with all the variety of steel coaster styles available … guests aren’t that ignorant to “similar” look &amp; feel.</p>
<p>The two in-park coasters basically do the exact same thing:</p>
<p>- initial up &amp; down at similar angles<br />
- inversions that twist upside down and dive to the ground or climb and twist out &#8230; it&#8217;s all similar<br />
- Storm Runners inline roll-dive is half-like the pretzel loop<br />
- they both meander around after the inversions<br />
- the new one really doesn&#8217;t have a unique layout &#8230; except for the pretzel, we&#8217;ve seen it all before</p>
<p>People will love it, of course, but for the long term?  I believe a better more popular decision could&#8217;ve been made.  A hyper coaster has a much broader appeal, and there popularity survives much longer.  Look at all the new mini-hypers the same company has built?  I don&#8217;t see why this new one isn&#8217;t a hyper!</p>
<p>Why didn’t they just put in an Invertigo to go with Boomerang?  It would’ve cost less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWalkInTheParkPodcastPat</title>
		<link>http://www.coasterdom.com/2008/02/20/weekly-topic-why-the-comparison/#comment-59812</link>
		<author>AWalkInTheParkPodcastPat</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.coasterdom.com/2008/02/20/weekly-topic-why-the-comparison/#comment-59812</guid>
		<description>Well i think the two should probably be compared to each other.  The two are the only 'beyond vertical' coasters that Intamin has ever made.  The two coasters are also opening a year apart from each other with some similar elements and trains.  Both parks are about always given very positive reviews by the coaster fan community.  Both had a large amount of hype leading to there annoucnement.

The two coasters are both of similar height and each has 2 corkscrews.  While maverick has 'sidewinding' elements and a mid-ride launch as opposed to Farhenheits Cobra Roll &#38; (awesome looking) Norwegian Loop.

I really think these two are more similar then different, you want coasters that are different compare Maverick to Beheomth or Farenheit to Steel Hawg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i think the two should probably be compared to each other.  The two are the only &#8216;beyond vertical&#8217; coasters that Intamin has ever made.  The two coasters are also opening a year apart from each other with some similar elements and trains.  Both parks are about always given very positive reviews by the coaster fan community.  Both had a large amount of hype leading to there annoucnement.</p>
<p>The two coasters are both of similar height and each has 2 corkscrews.  While maverick has &#8217;sidewinding&#8217; elements and a mid-ride launch as opposed to Farhenheits Cobra Roll &amp; (awesome looking) Norwegian Loop.</p>
<p>I really think these two are more similar then different, you want coasters that are different compare Maverick to Beheomth or Farenheit to Steel Hawg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
