Weekly Topic: Why the comparison?
I’ve been on quite a few coaster boards while following Fahrenheit construction. During my visits I’ve noticed a trend of people comparing Fahrenheit to Maverick. And for the life of me I don’t understand why these coasters are being related to one another.
Let me start off by saying that they do have a few things in common. The first is that they are both made by Intamin. Both of the rides feature a “beyond vertical drop” (I still hate that term). Finally they have those mini Intiman trains that now seem to be all the rage. If you really want to stretch it you could say that they are both a shade of red, but that’s just silly.
Let’s look at the first thing they have in common, the maker. Now just looking at the two parks, we have Millennium Force, Wicked Twister, Top Thrill Dragster, and Storm Runner all made by the same company. That’s a soon to be six Intamin coasters between two parks (hogs). All of these coasters are drastically different from each other, with the launches from Storm Runner and Top Thrill Dragster being the only things really in common.

Now each coaster features a beyond vertical drop, which is getting more and more popular. There other companies and coasters that also do this, so I’m not willing to compare Maverick and Fahrenheit based on that. The same could be said with the trains. Sorter trains seem to be the “in” thing right now. Look at Mystery Mine, it has short trains and a beyond vertical drop, but it is not compared to either of other two.
But what do these coasters differ on? I’m going to say a lot. Let’s take a look at their lift hills first. Fahrenheit has a 90 degree lift, like Mystery Mine, and Maverick has a non-traditional “launched” lift. Maverick also follows up the first launch with a second launch later in the ride.

What about the layout? Aren’t they pretty close? Sorry, but they really don’t have much in common. Take a look at the pictures provided. Fahrenheit is much more compact. Fahrenheit features six inversions compared to Maverick’s two. Fahrenheit has a Norwegian Loop, Cobra Roll, and a Double Corkscrew while Maverick has two twisted horseshoe rolls (according to RCDB). Fahrenheit is 1750 feet shorter then Maverick, Let’s take a look at the stats for a better idea of how these rides differ.
|
|
Maverick |
Fahrenheit |
|
Cost |
21 million |
12.1 million |
|
Capacity |
1200 pph |
850 pph |
|
Length |
4450’ |
2700’ |
|
Height |
105’ |
121’ |
|
Speed |
70 mph |
58 mph |
|
Duration |
2:30 |
1:25 |
|
Inversions |
2 |
6 |
Just looking at the stats I think it is pretty clear how different these rides are. Now you might be able to claim that Fahrenheit was inspired by Maverick, but we will never know the true answer to that. What do you think about the comparisons being made between the two coasters, discuss it in the forums.


February 20th, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Well i think the two should probably be compared to each other. The two are the only ‘beyond vertical’ coasters that Intamin has ever made. The two coasters are also opening a year apart from each other with some similar elements and trains. Both parks are about always given very positive reviews by the coaster fan community. Both had a large amount of hype leading to there annoucnement.
The two coasters are both of similar height and each has 2 corkscrews. While maverick has ’sidewinding’ elements and a mid-ride launch as opposed to Farhenheits Cobra Roll & (awesome looking) Norwegian Loop.
I really think these two are more similar then different, you want coasters that are different compare Maverick to Beheomth or Farenheit to Steel Hawg.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
I think most are comparing the wrong two rides. Of course they are similar, but Maverick has a truly unique layout. People should and will compare the roller coaster a few hundred feet away … in the same park!
I don’t know what they were thinking with this one. Having multiple wood coasters is a smart move (i.e. Holiday World, Hershey of course). Having extremely similar steel coasters with all the variety of steel coaster styles available … guests aren’t that ignorant to “similar” look & feel.
The two in-park coasters basically do the exact same thing:
- initial up & down at similar angles
- inversions that twist upside down and dive to the ground or climb and twist out … it’s all similar
- Storm Runners inline roll-dive is half-like the pretzel loop
- they both meander around after the inversions
- the new one really doesn’t have a unique layout … except for the pretzel, we’ve seen it all before
People will love it, of course, but for the long term? I believe a better more popular decision could’ve been made. A hyper coaster has a much broader appeal, and there popularity survives much longer. Look at all the new mini-hypers the same company has built? I don’t see why this new one isn’t a hyper!
Why didn’t they just put in an Invertigo to go with Boomerang? It would’ve cost less.